& OTHER GOV'T DECEPTIONS
TENACIOUS TREACHERY
Over a span of more than three decades, this provider has learned that there is nothing more tenacious and treacherous than our governments, their departments and their alleged services when it comes to requesting for entitlements to which they are obliged to provide you. The following is provided for those who wish to comprehend the extent of such treachery and the futility of the law courts to effectively remove such deceptions from our lives.
No matter how many different theaters and ports of call, retired members of the CF and RCMP only learn after they have removed their uniforms and attempted to retire, in this country that they have served and risked their lives for, the extent of the above-referenced treachery. This veteran, while attempting to obtain the illusionary service of justice from various government departments and, finally from the Canadian Courts, was recently notified by a solicitor of the Dept. of Justice (who represent the various government departments) that they expect to be given (i.e., ‘spoon fed’) with all of the facts so that they would be in a better position to abstain from providing the service that their department allegedly provides to the Canadian public. Such notification came earlier this week just moments before an appointed justice entered the court room to allegedly both hear and (allegedly not in a biased manner) rule upon the case at hand.
Shall we call it somewhat interesting that the Hon. Justice who initially appeared in Calgary to hear the case, actually gave the CRA (i.e., Canadian Robbers Association) the opportunity to reconsider their position .... suggesting support for this veteran’s position. Amazingly, and undoubtedly behind the scenes as the government always operates, this Hon. Justice was replaced by the current one who ruled against this veteran’s position .... and the corruption continues at all levels with these government departments.
That case concerned contentions that this appellant had with the CRA dept. concerning legal expenses the appellant had with another government department (i.e., the Veterans Review and Appeal Board, VRAB) which were unjustly and illegally denied by that department. Some history concerning that claim: The VRAB ruled on three separate occasions against this veteran’s application for a disability pension within the first year of application. This veteran was subsequently forced to bring the VRAB into the Trial Division of the Federal Court (Fed. Ct.) which ruled that the matter be referred back to a differently-constituted panel of the VRAB board. The allegedly differently-constituted VRAB panel ruled twice more within the next year against this veteran’s claim and were brought again before the Trial Division which ruled that the matter be referred back to a differently-constituted panel and awarded costs to this veteran. The allegedly differently-constituted VRAB panel failed to provide a decision within the next year, forcing this veteran to file a motion with the Trial Division of contempt of court. While the Trial Division would not award this application by citing the VRAB in contempt, it did award costs to this veteran where none were requested and supplied a step-by-step procedure to obtain justice in this case. With no legal training, this veteran attempted to bring the VRAB before the Trial Division again, after being denied a disability pension with the VRAB’s next decision, and consequently lost in this decision in spite of providing professional testimony from a neurosurgeon, and orthopedic surgeon and a general practitioner with more than 35 years of experience which were non contradicted by testimonies from similar professionals on the part of the VRAB. This veteran was encouraged to re-approach the Trial Division based upon a lady who won her case in the Appeal Division in Ontario using this veteran’s first two cases as precedents. The Trial Division, not more than 4 years ago, ruled again in the veteran’s favor and referred the matter back again to a differently-constituted panel of the VRAB board. That same board ruled on 4 more separate occassions against this veteran’s application for a disability pension, forcing the matter back to the Trial Division for ultimate resolution. The VRAB fully exhausted the total number of decisions to which they were entitled in this veteran’s application, recognizing that an award of a disability pension to this veteran would mean financial ruin and subsequent political suicide for the government ‘in charge’ at the time of such a decision, given the tens of thousands of other veterans who remained deprived of such benefits.
Just moments before the CRA hearing commenced, the above-referenced solicitor approached this appellant demanding identification of the documents which the appellant intended to use in that hearing. That solicitor’s initial intimidating position was that these documents were not identified in copies of previous correspondence that she had received from the appellant, even though more than half of those same documents originated from her current client and / or were provided to her client on previous dates. After this appellant identified this lack in effective communication between herself and her current client, that solicitor apparently decided to keep her mouth shut about objecting to these documents being used in this hearing. More than 95% of the remainder of the documents that the appellant used in that hearing had been previously supplied directly to that solicitor’s client.
That same aforementioned solicitor pleaded that this appellant had not provided evidence which either contradicted her current client’s unlawful position on the matter nor supported the appellant’s lawful position. This veteran recognizes that documentation is useless if presented to bodies who neither have the ability to read nor comprehend such documentation .... a fault which this veteran has observed in far too many rulings and judgements of government departments and Canadian Courts respectively to date. While possibly the previous justice assigned to that case was much more amenable to the appellant’s position, no doubt the ‘powers that be’ recognized this veteran’s position to be one which spelled instant financial ruin and political suicide and consequently, behind the scenes, arranged for an inexcusable replacement for that justice.
Recognizing that this veteran unsuccessfully continues to seek just retribution from another government department (i.e., the VRAB) to date, the awarding of any compensation by any and all Canadian courts of law will undoubtedly fall far short for this veteran who has lost his home, family and all of his possessions along with a significant degradation to his health given these government departments’ tenacious treachery.
As the government takes our money (in some cases even before we earn it) with alleged promises of providing services which this veteran and hundreds of thousands of other veterans and Canadian taxpayers, and we have no hope of obtaining that money back (sometimes waiting for months .... or years as in this case) unless we force ourselves into playing their games and seeking some illusory service of justice, be prepared to stop such robbery by stopping to play their game.
lima echo oscar (keeping with the style of the treacherous)
Tax Ct. CDN decision of Fri Jun 19, 2009: appellant’s action dismissed without costs = push the knife deeper into this vet’s back
The justice conveniently relied upon holes in legislation and jurisprudence to excuse the tax court (along with other fed. gov’t bandits) from any responsibility for the appellant’s ongoing penalties and sufferings
Such lack of vision is typical of all forms of justice and Canadian Law Courts decisions that this veteran has received to date and typifies the significant lack of comprehension that both the opponents and the law court justices have demonstrated to date.
Lesson: When dealing with a government bandit, don’t allow yourself to be drawn into their den of thieves who make an illusory promise of actual justice
As the government takes our money (in some cases even before we earn it) with alleged promises of providing services which this veteran and hundreds of thousands of other veterans and Canadian taxpayers, and we have no hope of obtaining that money back (sometimes waiting for months .... or years as in this case) unless we force ourselves into playing their games and seeking some illusory service of justice, be prepared to stop such robbery by stopping to play their game.
Shall we call it somewhat interesting that the Hon. Justice who initially appeared in Calgary to hear the case, actually gave the CRA the opportunity to reconsider their position .... suggesting support for this veteran’s position. Amazingly, and behind the scenes as the government always operates, this Hon. Justice was replaced by the current one who ruled against this veteran’s position .... and the corruption continues at all levels with these government departments.
The 'mo' of the government which is supported by insensitive decisions like the one described above, is to delay paying what is due to Canadian citizens as long as possible, with their hope being that the citizen will die prior to their having to actually meet their responsibilities. This gov't has delayed paying this vet a disability pension for more than 14 years and this misbehavior is actually endorsed both by decisions of Canadian law courts, like the one cited above, and our elected representatives who have become far too complacent with respect to claims like the one detailed above from the tens of thousands of other veterans.
AND THIS IS THE WAY THAT THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENTS, OVER THE PAST 80+ YEARS, HAVE BEEN PAYING BACK THE MEN AND WOMEN WHO HAVE PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE FOR THESE SAME GOVERNMENTS?
